“Robes” excerpt #1 – World War III

When the Robes visited, they said that IF there was another world war, it would not look like the first two world wars. They also made a comment that now means much more than it did back in the early 1980s. They said that most of the battle would be between those who wanted to hold onto old ways of doing things, and those who wanted to move ahead to new ways. Now I’m seeing this battle with sharp clarity. The Robes didn’t categorize the two sides in any way, nor did they point out any flaws in the thinking of either side. However, if one side is the cabal of corporation-based corruption that has taken over the U.S. and is pushing their ideas of a completely controlled New World Order, and  the other side is the growing movement to challenge that corruption, what are our alternatives? The last sentence in the excerpt below will give you something to think about.

“As the old ways come to a close and the new ways open, you will see the unfolding of struggle, fighting, and destruction in nearly every corner of your world.

“In the beginning there will be no nuclear weapons used in these battles, and there will be no major, international military conflagrations of a protracted sort that characterized World Wars I and II. But many kinds of serious conflict will spread across every land, bringing quick invasions based on greed and the desire to control others.

“As the nations begin breaking apart, this fighting will escalate and spread to many new places. Along with the ‘official’ international conflicts, there will be regional conflicts everywhere. This will include conflicts between cities and states, within cities and towns, and between tribes and old groupings as neighbor suddenly turns against neighbor…

“…These battles will be fought for all kinds of reasons – over food, water, land, air, animal rights, mineral rights, trade rights, and human rights. There will be arguments and bloodshed over boundaries, the right to govern, the right to speak the truth, the right to live where one wishes, to be spoken to with respect, treated with dignity, and to die when and how one chooses.

“…there will be few places left to run to that are not engaged in fighting, or where human beings are not suffering small wars, persecution, death, environmental disaster, or serious deprivation in large numbers….

“At this point you will realize that, for all intents and purposes, the world is engulfed in what will eventually be termed World War III. It will not look like the first two world wars with a common battlefield, trenches, and two sides lined up to confront one another, but it will be a world war due to the fact that almost everyone is fighting over everything.

“In order to survive you will have to regain a sense of purpose and direction in life, and to gain a sense of direction you will have to do things very differently. Therefore, a great number of the battles will be between those attempting to hold on to old ways of doing things and those who want to move ahead to new ways…If you are wise, you will work to find peaceful and creative ways to help one another.”    (from “Robes – A Book of Coming Changes” based on information the Robes gave me from 1980-1982, and published in 1997.)

If one of the sides in the battle is corruption…then what?

5 thoughts on ““Robes” excerpt #1 – World War III

  1. Pingback: Two apparently channeled messages resonate for me today. | Exopermaculture

  2. There’s a war going on alright – an economic war. Since 1971, when Nixon ended the convertibility of the US dollar to gold, moves have been afoot to usher in a new system. This is why the euro was created. The Eurosystem does noes not advocate a gold standard or any hard peg to gold at all. In the Eurosystem, gold floats freely on the asset side of the central bank balance sheet. And in this system, it uses gold as the primary store of value, not government bonds (US treasuries) like the Bretton Woods 2 system does now. Notice how the ECB does not have bonds? It is a non-nation state central bank (the only one). Each country has their own bonds, just like municipalities or states. But for the Eurosystem to take over, the paper futures gold market has to collapse. And it will, under its own weight. This was expected to come to pass around the turn of the century, but there were some unexpected developments (like the rise of China). Note how over the past decade physical gold (in massive quantities) has been moving from West to East and note the new political alliances that are forming between Russia, China and other eastern countries. Those who pull the strings are putting everything in place for a new global economic system to emerge.

    Now, getting back on topic, “They said that most of the battle would be between those who wanted to hold onto old ways of doing things, and those who wanted to move ahead to new ways.” I believe the men in robes may have been referring to the paradigm shift occurring right before our eyes (hidden in plain sight). The old guard will go down kicking and screaming, so the question is whether this turns into a shooting war?

    • I think you’re quite right, and at the risk of upsetting people, I would add that something about the situation in Ferguson, MO hasn’t felt right since the first moment I heard about it. I think we’re being “worked” into a frenzy and a lot of people are falling for it. Someone did die, thus there’s a true loss of life, and a real reason to be upset and to grieve. But the reaction of my inner “truth meter” when I first heard the news was something like, “There they go again…trying to start trouble…another Trayvon/Zimmerman incident in which some poor guy is targeted in hopes of stirring up riots…we’ll know by how much media attention it gets, after all, how many other young black men are killed in the course of a year and get no attention at all…they probably didn’t release the name of the guy who shot him because it was a government sniper…I wonder who the police stooge will be…poor guy, they don’t really care whose life they ruin…maybe what they’re up to has something to do with causing riots that will cause enough destruction in that neighborhood to justify rebuilding in a more up-to-date manner…and if that’s the case, why don’t they just step up and say they’d like to rebuild a neighborhood and make it better…why do they have to set up a destructive scenario in order to do some good…”

      • I think the motivations behind these sorts of events are far more insidious than the rebuilding of a neighborhood.

        Another recent event where the official narrative is a complete load of baloney is the shooting down of flight MH17 over Ukraine. Evidence shows bullet holes on both sides of the aircraft fuselage, which can only mean it was brought down by a fighter jet. I believe that event was a CIA false flag attack to incite war with Russia. http://rt.com/op-edge/177388-mh17-cia-false-ukraine/

      • You may be right about “motivations” in Ferguson. Whatever the real story is, it worries me that the government is “working it” so zealously. Why would the attorney general of the U.S. go to visit the Brown family? How many other bereaved families does he visit?

Comments are closed.