Tag Archive | Disinformation

Weapons for Silent Wars???

I received the following link in my inbox…

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_38tsQ4p0I   (about an hour in duration)

along with the question, “What do you think of this?” I watched the video and replied, but thought the whole thing – video and reply – might be useful for helping others sort out the stuff being passed around on the internet. So I’m sharing it here.

Hi Gary,

I watched and listened to the video and was not impressed at any level. I don’t know who wrote it, but within the first few moments my intuition was on high ‘fraud’ alert. The entire document smacks of something created recently that is trying to look and sound older than it really is.

It starts out saying that the document was delivered to their offices by an unknown person, and that it was not stolen or gotten by dishonest means. Later, it says the document was found inside a copy machine. Which was it – delivered by an unknown person or found inside a copy machine? Perhaps a copy machine was delivered to their offices by an unknown person??? That is possible, but that is stretching things to make them fit and to overlook the contradictory statements about how the document was found. People who go to great lengths to make the origins of something very murky and mysterious often make contradictory statements like this.

Supposedly the document has been authenticated by 4 experts – but no proof or names are given that would back up such claims. The problem with lack of proof is often explained away by saying that people want to remain anonymous. However, my observation of documents that are legitimate is that people sign their names and often feel they are doing something good in the world. Even David Rockefeller said that he felt he was doing something good by trying to get the world into a New World Order.

The document was obviously written by someone who sees the world through the eyes of a mechanical/electrical engineer who is very good at math. He-or-she has put a lot of thought into interpreting the world through the metaphor of engineering and clearly sees the analogies between the mechanics of engineering and the mechanics of the banking system.

Since it is over 40 pages, and hardly anyone is willing to read anything anymore, it was probably hoped that by claiming it was “a leaked document outlining a plan to destroy us written a long time ago and found accidentally” perhaps more people would read it and be upset with our government and entire financial system. This idea of creating distrust in this way does result in chaos, but if the truth comes out, it can quickly backfire.

The document has been carefully scrubbed of almost all references to computers until you get almost to the end, and then computers are mentioned only briefly. I graduated from high school in 1966 and my very first job was in a computer office. I was also married to a computer programmer-turned-cop. Thus, I am very familiar with computers, their presence in business and the population, and their evolution from the mid-60s onward. The entire feeling of this document is one of careful avoidance of mentioning computers because that would give away how recently it was written.

Speaking of being scrubbed, in spite of the efforts to make the document sound like a plan leaked from CIA or political offices, there are a few key words and phrases that indicate it was written recently. Words like “shock” – as in the shock doctrine, or phrases like “Problem-Reaction-Solution.” These are very current phrases and hint at the fact that the document is not as old as it purports to be. There are a few allusions to the CIA being implicated in this document, which is supposedly part of a training program, but these few references seem to be trying too hard to connect the CIA to the whole thing. It doesn’t ring true.

Copy machines existed in 1979, a date that is mentioned in the document, and maybe a few VERY sophisticated machines were around back then, but I question the idea that they had the capacity to store documents in them at that time. I’m not sure what year copiers, computers, and printers merged, but in any case, the story gets very questionable in hinting that this “plan” originated shortly after WWII and was accidentally left in a copy machine.  It is also quite unlikely that a 40-page paper document left in the document feeder would be unnoticed and accidentally delivered with said copy machine.

The narrator and several unknown others supposedly find the document plans “disturbing” yet there is little that amounts to a “plan” in the document. The document remind me of the writings of the “Uni-bomber” and is mostly the ranting of someone who is highly irritated with the “ignorant masses” who “refuse to think for themselves.”

I am no expert on documents purporting to tell of the planned destruction of humans, but this document has more of a feeling of some individual simply bemoaning the things he is observing out there in the world, back-tracing the origins of what he is seeing, and trying to assign blame – which mostly falls on the ignorant masses as being “stupid and lazy.” The few documents I have read that consist of real “plans” and that have the capacity for destructive results are not usually written in engineering/mathematical language. Those that are – like the patent documents on manipulation of weather – do not contain paragraph after paragraph ranting about humanity and describing how they are being manipulated. Scientific notation is not the language that bankers, social engineers, or politicians use. This has more of a flavor of the document author realizing that banking, money, and the economy are being used to manipulate society, compares it to his field of expertise (engineering of some sort) and expresses helpless rage that other people do not see what is happening, thus are not doing anything about it.

One of the problems of our time is that there really ARE efforts to set up a New World Order, no one really knows what the original motives of those doing this were, AND the Powers-That-Be went about this in a really stupid manner! It could have been done in an upfront, positive, inclusive, look-at-the-magnificent-world-we-can-create-together kind of way. Instead, they tried to be sneaky. This left the taste of mistrust in everyone’s craw. We DO need to do something about over-population and we know it…but not the way the Globalists are going about it. We DO need to reduce the destruction of the planet…but not by spinning lies about ‘climate warming’ when the truth is we know very little about the real life cycles of the planet and have not put together a decent story that can be adopted and appreciated by all. We DO need to stop wars and fighting over resources, but not by creating stronger and more destructive weapons. These are only some of the issues.

We are seeing a proliferation of false documents, lies, misperceptions, biased reporting, news that is distorted and incomplete, and attempts to stir up trouble between and among us. This document strikes me as one of those attempts.

Penny

Mainstream News and Thinking For Yourself

People have forgotten how to think for themselves. Are you one of them?  You are if you still watch and listen to mainstream news. Mainstream news is little more than baby pablum put together and spoon fed to you in nice, neat sound bites to make sure you never get the whole truth. Mainstream news is useful for only one thing – to get an idea of what the people in power want you to focus your attention on. It doesn’t matter whether it is truthful or not. It doesn’t matter that it is shallow or heavily biased. It doesn’t matter that the entire background and much of the story is missing. It doesn’t matter whether you believe it or not. It only matters that you spend your precious consciousness focused on it because that means you’re NOT focused on anything else that might tell you the whole truth – or develop your ability to discern the truth for yourself.

In the same way that we now have to bag our own groceries, do our own bank deposits, pump our own gas, figure out our own healing programs, and put together our own music, we now have to put together our own news. You have to do your homework when it comes to the news. Look around. Dig for info. What shows up? What fits together?

There is a ton of misinformation, bias, disinformation, nonsense, fear, propaganda, and crap out there. There have been plenty of times I threw my hands in the air and thought, “This is ridiculous! Everything I read or watch contradicts the thing I just finished reading or watching.” But learning how to put the news together is like anything else, you have to start somewhere. You will pass through stages.

The first stage is usually shock. You think the majority of what you are reading and hearing can’t possibly be true.

The next stage is overwhelm. Who and what should you believe? There is too much to even begin to assimilate a small amount of it. You drift from one extreme website or YouTube report to another.

The third stage is sorting.  Some of what you read begins to sink in and you begin to see certain themes again and again, read certain sources frequently, and develop a loose framework of ideas about what is actually happening in our world.

The fourth stage is arguing. You begin to get a fair but flawed picture of what is going on in the world and try to tell your family and friends – who are not really interested and who sometimes accuse you of becoming a conspiracy theorist. You back away in embarrassment and uncertainty.

The fifth stage is going deeper. Stinging from the criticism of family and friends, you expand your reading and listening in order to get a more accurate picture. You listen to all sides of a topic and a wide variety of reports – pro and con – about events taking place or continuing to unfold, and you begin to develop a well-rounded picture of what is going on in the world. You find yourself following certain threads more closely than others. You also begin to recognize who is grounded and accurate as well as who gets totally caught up in hyperbole and melodrama.

The sixth stage is discernment. By now you have a number of sources you go to regularly. You know how to listen to what is being said and what isn’t being said, and you are putting pieces together to make a fairly accurate assessment of the situation in many areas of life on our planet.

The last stage is thinking for yourself. At this stage, you have a sense of the history and background in the issues of our time. You know who is pushing one set of ideas and who is peddling a competing set of ideas, and you’re pretty clear about how each source is most likely to present the information at hand, what their positon and their biases are. You also know what your position and biases are as well. In other words, you have begun to know yourself, achieved the ability to see, hear, and think for yourself, assess what is likely to come down the pike, and to make appropriate decisions. Nothing is more critical for you in the development of your own consciousness!