Tag Archive | truth

Weapons for Silent Wars???

I received the following link in my inbox…

Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_38tsQ4p0I   (about an hour in duration)

along with the question, “What do you think of this?” I watched the video and replied, but thought the whole thing – video and reply – might be useful for helping others sort out the stuff being passed around on the internet. So I’m sharing it here.

Hi Gary,

I watched and listened to the video and was not impressed at any level. I don’t know who wrote it, but within the first few moments my intuition was on high ‘fraud’ alert. The entire document smacks of something created recently that is trying to look and sound older than it really is.

It starts out saying that the document was delivered to their offices by an unknown person, and that it was not stolen or gotten by dishonest means. Later, it says the document was found inside a copy machine. Which was it – delivered by an unknown person or found inside a copy machine? Perhaps a copy machine was delivered to their offices by an unknown person??? That is possible, but that is stretching things to make them fit and to overlook the contradictory statements about how the document was found. People who go to great lengths to make the origins of something very murky and mysterious often make contradictory statements like this.

Supposedly the document has been authenticated by 4 experts – but no proof or names are given that would back up such claims. The problem with lack of proof is often explained away by saying that people want to remain anonymous. However, my observation of documents that are legitimate is that people sign their names and often feel they are doing something good in the world. Even David Rockefeller said that he felt he was doing something good by trying to get the world into a New World Order.

The document was obviously written by someone who sees the world through the eyes of a mechanical/electrical engineer who is very good at math. He-or-she has put a lot of thought into interpreting the world through the metaphor of engineering and clearly sees the analogies between the mechanics of engineering and the mechanics of the banking system.

Since it is over 40 pages, and hardly anyone is willing to read anything anymore, it was probably hoped that by claiming it was “a leaked document outlining a plan to destroy us written a long time ago and found accidentally” perhaps more people would read it and be upset with our government and entire financial system. This idea of creating distrust in this way does result in chaos, but if the truth comes out, it can quickly backfire.

The document has been carefully scrubbed of almost all references to computers until you get almost to the end, and then computers are mentioned only briefly. I graduated from high school in 1966 and my very first job was in a computer office. I was also married to a computer programmer-turned-cop. Thus, I am very familiar with computers, their presence in business and the population, and their evolution from the mid-60s onward. The entire feeling of this document is one of careful avoidance of mentioning computers because that would give away how recently it was written.

Speaking of being scrubbed, in spite of the efforts to make the document sound like a plan leaked from CIA or political offices, there are a few key words and phrases that indicate it was written recently. Words like “shock” – as in the shock doctrine, or phrases like “Problem-Reaction-Solution.” These are very current phrases and hint at the fact that the document is not as old as it purports to be. There are a few allusions to the CIA being implicated in this document, which is supposedly part of a training program, but these few references seem to be trying too hard to connect the CIA to the whole thing. It doesn’t ring true.

Copy machines existed in 1979, a date that is mentioned in the document, and maybe a few VERY sophisticated machines were around back then, but I question the idea that they had the capacity to store documents in them at that time. I’m not sure what year copiers, computers, and printers merged, but in any case, the story gets very questionable in hinting that this “plan” originated shortly after WWII and was accidentally left in a copy machine.  It is also quite unlikely that a 40-page paper document left in the document feeder would be unnoticed and accidentally delivered with said copy machine.

The narrator and several unknown others supposedly find the document plans “disturbing” yet there is little that amounts to a “plan” in the document. The document remind me of the writings of the “Uni-bomber” and is mostly the ranting of someone who is highly irritated with the “ignorant masses” who “refuse to think for themselves.”

I am no expert on documents purporting to tell of the planned destruction of humans, but this document has more of a feeling of some individual simply bemoaning the things he is observing out there in the world, back-tracing the origins of what he is seeing, and trying to assign blame – which mostly falls on the ignorant masses as being “stupid and lazy.” The few documents I have read that consist of real “plans” and that have the capacity for destructive results are not usually written in engineering/mathematical language. Those that are – like the patent documents on manipulation of weather – do not contain paragraph after paragraph ranting about humanity and describing how they are being manipulated. Scientific notation is not the language that bankers, social engineers, or politicians use. This has more of a flavor of the document author realizing that banking, money, and the economy are being used to manipulate society, compares it to his field of expertise (engineering of some sort) and expresses helpless rage that other people do not see what is happening, thus are not doing anything about it.

One of the problems of our time is that there really ARE efforts to set up a New World Order, no one really knows what the original motives of those doing this were, AND the Powers-That-Be went about this in a really stupid manner! It could have been done in an upfront, positive, inclusive, look-at-the-magnificent-world-we-can-create-together kind of way. Instead, they tried to be sneaky. This left the taste of mistrust in everyone’s craw. We DO need to do something about over-population and we know it…but not the way the Globalists are going about it. We DO need to reduce the destruction of the planet…but not by spinning lies about ‘climate warming’ when the truth is we know very little about the real life cycles of the planet and have not put together a decent story that can be adopted and appreciated by all. We DO need to stop wars and fighting over resources, but not by creating stronger and more destructive weapons. These are only some of the issues.

We are seeing a proliferation of false documents, lies, misperceptions, biased reporting, news that is distorted and incomplete, and attempts to stir up trouble between and among us. This document strikes me as one of those attempts.

Penny

Media, Truth, and Perception

There have been a number of people asking me what sources I use for my information. The latest was Janet, so I decided to answer in a post.

When it comes to television, I watch it rarely, maybe once every couple of months. When I do, I watch Link TV with Amy Goodman. The rest of TV has been a wasteland for a long time and network TV will probably never fulfill the promise of its potential to develop and educate us.

Regarding newspapers, the mainstream newspaper I still read most often is the New York Times – mostly to get a good feel for the propaganda being perpetrated on the U.S. The NYT seems to have suddenly tempered some of their reporting a tiny bit since the election, but is still very biased and still failing to report all of what is going on in a balanced way. As for radio, I no longer listen to radio or NPR at all – most of that stuff is milktoast.

A side note… Since I travel to the east coast a fair amount, it is clear to me that the people in Washington DC and New York – all of whom have been lost in some very comfortable illusions for a long time – are about to experience a taste of what Detroit experienced when the Big 3 automakers suddenly found themselves ousted by Japanese carmakers…uncertainty, loss of income, abrupt expulsion from the illusion of security, a total paradigm shift, and a feeling of their world being turned upside down. My point in mentioning this is that all of the mainstream media has been totally controlled by the people in Washington DC and New York.

To get an idea of what is really going on and how people think and feel outside of DC, New York, and the U.S., I visit sites like NSNBC (my favorite), InfoWars, DrudgeReport, Breitbart, Truthdig, ZeroHedge, RealistNews, NewEasternOutlook, Xinhua News Agency, Jon Rappaport, RT News, Veterans Today, Washington’s Blog, Gmail News, French news, English news, Russian news, and a number of sites that are not well known at all but still provide a serious context for what is happening in the world around us.

I think it would be important to say that I am not looking for “the truth” from any of these sources. I am looking at the consciousness and assessing the language that is represented by each of these outlets. I then put together a picture for myself of what people are saying, thinking, and doing here and there. I weigh all of this along with what my own inner knowing is telling me, and out of this emerges a picture of what might be called “What is.”

This picture of ‘what is’ gets sifted, sorted, added to, subtracted from, dumped, retrieved, tweaked, and re-shaped again and again over the ensuing days and weeks, eventually resulting in something much broader and deeper than any media outlet could ever present. It allows me to see what is happening and to examine all of the factors that are in play at any given time.  In other words, “the truth” is something I discern for myself, and I am never in a hurry to declare what that truth is. What most people think is true, is usually just a momentary snapshot of where they are pointing their perception and attention.

People Voted for Change in Government…Not in the Electoral College!!

People are pushing the idea of removing the Electoral College!?! IMHO this is a very bad idea.

The Electoral College was formed with an eye to preventing any possibility of groups of states with selfish regional interests from ganging up on smaller states or states far away from their problems and issues, and then pushing their agenda onto those smaller or more remote states. It was a way of making sure that we were all in this together. Removing the Electoral College will clear the way for exactly this kind of ganging up to happen and will probably guarantee the breakup of the U.S. into smaller regional governments with localized platforms.

We stand a chance of breaking up anyway because we have grown past the practicality of democracy. The concept of “one-person-one-vote” does not work well once you get past a certain number of people. It’s like nanotechnology – all the rules change at certain sizes. Of course, we may also break up simply by leaving Mr. Trump in place, however, there is no reason to expect that anything bad will happen just because he is president – unless we are not paying attention to what is going on! People voted for change, but I don’t think they wanted change in the Electoral College… they wanted a say in their own lives.

Trump is only in for four years. Someone else may follow him IF we hang together as a country. Tearing up the Electoral College is almost certainly going to have long-term results that we do not want and didn’t expect, including the breakup of the nation. However one chooses to look at the situation, it is clear that Trump is a harbinger of change, and going back to change what worked in the past is not where we should be putting our time and attention. We must keep the democratic principles and move on and up to new forms of self-governance that are yet to be created.

Underneath the Election Drama

I am watching the current election drama with great interest and a sense of the appalling. What appalls me is not Hillary’s corruption or Trump’s pompousness, it is how few people seem to recognize what is going on and what is at stake. I don’t want to get into a long story about my sources, but here is what is happening according to their first-hand involvement.

There are three factions involved in our political elections at the moment. One is the Bush-Clinton-Rockefeller cabal (BCR). Another is the Rothschild group (RG). The third is the old French and German noble families (FGN).

The BCR cabal has been described as a bunch of money-hungry, blood-thirsty elites who want to maintain their control over the U.S. financial system AND reduce population. The RG hates the BCR, however, the RG does want to maintain financial control and doesn’t really care if the population count goes down as long as they can profit from whatever is happening. The FGN families were a target during WWI and many went underground in order to survive the long-ongoing attempts to destroy the monarchy. They have regrouped, have come together, and want to break the back of the Cabal.

Even though the Rothschilds hate the Bush-Clinton-Rockefellers, these two groups have come together to support Hillary Clinton and get her into the presidency so the financial control will remain in Cabal hands. The French-German nobility are the ones who convinced Trump to run and are backing him all the way in the hope that he will win and break the Cabal’s grip on the financial system. These two sides (the BCR/RG vs. FGN) are in an all-out war. The BCR/RG side has said they will do anything to prevent Trump from winning. They are considering three possibilities: a nationwide EMP to knock out the computers at election time, a virus in the banking system that would bring everything to a halt, and a serious false flag attack in a major American city. In my humble opinion, if they were to use either of the first two options, they would be shooting themselves in the foot. The third option – a major false flag – is their usual “go-to” solution and if they were going to do anything at all, it would probably be the third option, especially if they could figure out a way to blame Russia, much as they blamed Iraq for the Sept. 11th attack.

Even though I would love to see a woman in the presidency, it is not Hillary. Some women are blinded by the idea that it is time for a woman to be president and don’t want to see the bigger picture of corruption hiding in plain sight in her background. If we’re going to have a woman at the helm, I want her to be someone with integrity, honor, and truth in her background.

Even though I wouldn’t ordinarily choose someone like Trump for president, I look at him and think, “Trump is a wild card. We really don’t know what will happen if he is elected.” Then I look at the Cabal’s history of corruption, murder, and deception that has filled the last few decades and think, “Do we dare use Trump to break the pattern…the power…the back of the Cabal???”

There is an old saying that may apply here. If you don’t like what you’re getting, do something different…do anything different…and be ready to ride the waves of change!

If Hillary gets elected, the Robes said long ago, “When the first woman gets elected, you will know that the end of your nation is near.”

If Trump gets elected, it is impossible to say how things might unfold. But I suspect that government will never be the same again. He may act more like a king than an elected president, but he is very smart and very capable of learning quickly. He would learn to respond. The question is, which of the many competing groups would he respond to? And can he rise above the competition to inspire a cooperative vision in all of us? That is what we must have in our leadership or we will continue to come apart.

I’ve tried to see which way things will go, but the problem is that I can’t see an election at all! I don’t know if I just can’t see clearly, or if, somehow, there isn’t going to be an election. We will have to wait and watch.

Is Hillary the Marie Antoinette of Our Time?

I look at Hillary and Bill Clinton as the Marie Antoinette and Louis XVI of our time. The truth is going to come out, and they are likely to be destroyed. If she becomes president of the U.S., and she continues to host the ongoing financial corruption, she may even inherit the French queen’s title, Madame Deficit.

9 Guidelines to Use When Navigating the Alternative News

This started out as a reply to Tom Van Berckel, but became an entire blog. Thanks for the inspiration, Tom! And thanks for the compliment.

You aren’t the only one who gets confused when trying to figure out what to believe or who to listen to when wading through the ocean of alternative news. In my experience, and from conversations with many others, it takes at least a couple of years to learn to navigate that ocean and develop the capacity to put together a realistic picture of what’s going on out there. Along the way you discover several things that really have more to do with consciousness than anything else.

#1 – everyone has their own point of view and whether we think their views are right or wrong is somewhat irrelevant. Their point of view tells us where they are at with their perception, NOT where we should be at with ours! We each NEED our own point of view because that is the center point from which we communicate, learn, change, and grow.

#2 – we live in a consensus reality system – but that consensus is VERY loose. In my view, it is amazing that it holds together at all given the huge diversity of beliefs, experience, and perception that exist here. It is only because of our tolerance (unspoken) for one another, and our gratitude (unacknowledged) for their willingness (unconscious) to help hold it all together, that we are able to continue with the reality.

#3 – the idea of “proof” is useless. Even the best of scientists rarely think in terms of “proof.” They say, “This is what most of us agree on at the moment,” and they know that new insights and information will eventually go beyond the current agreement. My own stand is that there is no proof, there is only what we each experience, and each of us is responsible for assessing that experience from moment to moment and responding to it wisely and well. For most of us who are trying to wade through the huge amounts of alternative news, a good rule of thumb for judging any news is that the reporter should at least have some evidence to show, and when they have finished offering evidence, they should make it clear when they are switching to their own interpretation of that evidence.

#4 – you will resonate deeply in your gut, your heart, and your mind when you see or read news that is true and important for YOU to know. Not all news is relevant to all people.

#5 – listen to what people say, but watch carefully what they do. Keep a notebook handy in which you jot down lists, or create a folder on your computer in which you save speeches of key promises and predictions that people make. Then pay attention to whether they do what they said they would do, or how they behave when the prediction doesn’t come true. A few people will complain that this is too much work, but this is the burden of being a real citizen. We are where we are in this country because the hens have been selling eggs AND fresh chicken to the fox – and no one is paying attention!

#6 – find news sources that do a fairly good job of synthesizing lots of information and presenting a well-thought-out view of the big picture, or that consistently present smaller slices of information in a clear and honest way. The task here is to eventually find news sources you trust and that you can return to again and again because their information is always presented in a straightforward,  thoughtful way that makes you think.

#7 – learn to discern the difference between sources that sometimes get excited or upset about something, those who are continually outraged and spouting off about it, or those that are always trying to incite fear and dread. It’s like the difference between fresh milk (news), sour milk (news with an attitude), and fermented milk (news with a hidden agenda). In each case it’s milk, but you will respond differently to each.

#8 – you have a right to be interested in some things and not others. Follow the threads of conversation and information that you find interesting, and let yourself become knowledgeable and aware in the areas that you are interested in. Some people love politics, others love to read about the economy, some are only interested in technology, or science, or war, or psychology. Some follow music closely, or entertainment, or sports. So follow your nose, consuming information and arguments about the things that interest you, and occasionally graze in other pastures that offer other topics.

#9 – as for “truth,” there is only one unchanging and reliable truth – and that is that everything in existence is made of an intelligent Light that we call God, or Source, or The Universe, or whatever. All the stuff that emerges from that Light is temporary, which is why we say it is an illusion. It’s really not an illusion, it’s just temporary in the sense that it is not eternal and forever unchanging like that Light is. But you can damn well count on having a sore foot if you drop a brick on it. You can’t just blow that off as “illusion.” The truth is that it hurts!

In closing…we are in the middle of a paradigm shift of global proportions. A paradigm shift is a change in consciousness. If you are going to make that shift along with everyone else, you have to take responsibility for what you feed that consciousness and what you do with that consciousness. We are moving out of the paradigm of one-size-fits-all-and-one-story-informs-all. How you assemble the world is up to you!