"Robes" excerpt #1 - World War III

[…] “Robes” excerpt #1 – World War III […]

There’s a war going on alright – an economic war. Since 1971, when Nixon ended the convertibility of the US dollar to gold, moves have been afoot to usher in a new system. This is why the euro was created. The Eurosystem does noes not advocate a gold standard or any hard peg to gold at all. In the Eurosystem, gold floats freely on the asset side of the central bank balance sheet. And in this system, it uses gold as the primary store of value, not government bonds (US treasuries) like the Bretton Woods 2 system does now. Notice how the ECB does not have bonds? It is a non-nation state central bank (the only one). Each country has their own bonds, just like municipalities or states. But for the Eurosystem to take over, the paper futures gold market has to collapse. And it will, under its own weight. This was expected to come to pass around the turn of the century, but there were some unexpected developments (like the rise of China). Note how over the past decade physical gold (in massive quantities) has been moving from West to East and note the new political alliances that are forming between Russia, China and other eastern countries. Those who pull the strings are putting everything in place for a new global economic system to emerge.

Now, getting back on topic, “They said that most of the battle would be between those who wanted to hold onto old ways of doing things, and those who wanted to move ahead to new ways.” I believe the men in robes may have been referring to the paradigm shift occurring right before our eyes (hidden in plain sight). The old guard will go down kicking and screaming, so the question is whether this turns into a shooting war?

I think you’re quite right, and at the risk of upsetting people, I would add that something about the situation in Ferguson, MO hasn’t felt right since the first moment I heard about it. I think we’re being “worked” into a frenzy and a lot of people are falling for it. Someone did die, thus there’s a true loss of life, and a real reason to be upset and to grieve. But the reaction of my inner “truth meter” when I first heard the news was something like, “There they go again…trying to start trouble…another Trayvon/Zimmerman incident in which some poor guy is targeted in hopes of stirring up riots…we’ll know by how much media attention it gets, after all, how many other young black men are killed in the course of a year and get no attention at all…they probably didn’t release the name of the guy who shot him because it was a government sniper…I wonder who the police stooge will be…poor guy, they don’t really care whose life they ruin…maybe what they’re up to has something to do with causing riots that will cause enough destruction in that neighborhood to justify rebuilding in a more up-to-date manner…and if that’s the case, why don’t they just step up and say they’d like to rebuild a neighborhood and make it better…why do they have to set up a destructive scenario in order to do some good…”

I think the motivations behind these sorts of events are far more insidious than the rebuilding of a neighborhood.

Another recent event where the official narrative is a complete load of baloney is the shooting down of flight MH17 over Ukraine. Evidence shows bullet holes on both sides of the aircraft fuselage, which can only mean it was brought down by a fighter jet. I believe that event was a CIA false flag attack to incite war with Russia. http://rt.com/op-edge/177388-mh17-cia-false-ukraine/

You may be right about “motivations” in Ferguson. Whatever the real story is, it worries me that the government is “working it” so zealously. Why would the attorney general of the U.S. go to visit the Brown family? How many other bereaved families does he visit?